Author Topic: Replica Factor Ostro VAM  (Read 54666 times)

voidptr

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #300 on: February 26, 2025, 09:37:56 AM »
Exactly! All these shops seems to be using the same photos. When asking for instock items, it's probably best to request at least one picture with a handwritten timestamp (or ask them to hold a household item or something else). You can also check for exif metadata (gps data, timestamps, etc.).

patliean1

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #301 on: February 26, 2025, 09:44:50 AM »
Exactly! All these shops seems to be using the same photos. When asking for instock items, it's probably best to request at least one picture with a handwritten timestamp (or ask them to hold a household item or something else). You can also check for exif metadata (gps data, timestamps, etc.).

If you have to request any of this nonsense, you should immediately take your business elsewhere.

Serge_K

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #302 on: February 26, 2025, 12:32:23 PM »
If you have to request any of this nonsense, you should immediately take your business elsewhere.

Yep... And that goes back to my thread about not buying fakes because of how shady the whole thing gets the moment you start asking questions... If i spend 500$ on a frame, I ask questions. If i am asked to shell $1000, i ask even more questions :)
Fast on the flat. And nowhere else.

acino

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #303 on: February 26, 2025, 02:39:16 PM »
Yep... And that goes back to my thread about not buying fakes because of how shady the whole thing gets the moment you start asking questions... If i spend 500$ on a frame, I ask questions. If i am asked to shell $1000, i ask even more questions :)

I see where you're coming from, and I understand why you hold that perspective.

You're likely looking for technical details, but that depends on whether the sellers are directly involved in manufacturing or just third-party resellers. For the same reason, my local seller probably couldn't answer detailed questions about frame production. Even with well-known Western brands, you'd likely not get more than, "that's proprietary information." I get that those brands have already built a certain level of trust. But when buying a frame from Asia, there’s always some degree of risk. You never really know if the answers you get are accurate or just what the seller thinks you want to hear anyway - and that applies not only to those selling fakes (e.g. Winspace telling the guy that the disgusting BB is ok is a good example)

My perspective is much more cynical - I am suspicious of the answers regardless of the seller. Perhaps it's the experimental scientist in me, but ultimately all we can rely on is empirical testing and first-hand experience with a reasonable sample size is what really matters imo. At the end of the day, it all comes down to how much of a gambler you are.

Edit: That is why people like Pat above are such a fantastic resource
« Last Edit: February 27, 2025, 04:21:42 AM by acino »

dieNadel

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #304 on: February 27, 2025, 05:05:50 AM »
I asked RK Ultra Extreme Carbon Fiber Store about shipping to the EU/Germany, which isn't possible atm. They said that they're working on implementing DPD shipping "this year" and to wait patiently for a while.

Serge_K

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #305 on: February 27, 2025, 07:11:22 AM »
You're likely looking for technical details, but that depends on whether the sellers are directly involved in manufacturing or just third-party resellers. For the same reason, my local seller probably couldn't answer detailed questions about frame production. Even with well-known Western brands, you'd likely not get more than, "that's proprietary information." I get that those brands have already built a certain level of trust. But when buying a frame from Asia, there’s always some degree of risk. You never really know if the answers you get are accurate or just what the seller thinks you want to hear anyway - and that applies not only to those selling fakes (e.g. Winspace telling the guy that the disgusting BB is ok is a good example)

My perspective is much more cynical - I am suspicious of the answers regardless of the seller. Perhaps it's the experimental scientist in me, but ultimately all we can rely on is empirical testing and first-hand experience with a reasonable sample size is what really matters imo. At the end of the day, it all comes down to how much of a gambler you are.


I disagree because that line of reasoning is anti human and frankly just nihilistic, and ultimately puts on the same plane the worst criminals with the best operators. Or it ultimately implies that due diligence is useless.
I do agree that getting an answer to a question doesn't make it true, yes illusion of control is a thing, but you can't use that line of thought to say that nobody can't be trusted so it's just a gamble. It's not.
Fast on the flat. And nowhere else.

acino

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #306 on: February 27, 2025, 10:16:29 AM »
I disagree because that line of reasoning is anti human and frankly just nihilistic, and ultimately puts on the same plane the worst criminals with the best operators. Or it ultimately implies that due diligence is useless.
I do agree that getting an answer to a question doesn't make it true, yes illusion of control is a thing, but you can't use that line of thought to say that nobody can't be trusted so it's just a gamble. It's not.

I do not think it is nihilistic. That is the consequence of virtually zero custom protection when purchasing through these channels. There is a reason why customer protection laws are established, or the situation would be very similar elsewhere. What good is an answer if you have no way of telling if it is accurate? Seller tells a buyer that the frame is 90% T800 and 10% T1100 - there is no way of knowing if its accurate (knowingly or unknowingly), but I understand why it can make the buyer more inclined to make the purchase. There are many motivations to give you a genuine answer, many motivations/reasons to not give you an answer at all - not necessarily due to malice or connected to quality of the product - and there are no repercussions either way whatsoever.

I did not say that nobody can be trusted, but that empirical evidence is all that matters. Whether we like it or not, it is a gamble - even established, tested Chinese brands sometimes ship a flop. All of us are just trying to improve our odds, either by asking questions or relying on (someone's) first-hand experience.

Edit: I don't know, perhaps it's just my job, where experimental evidence is the only thing that matters, manifesting...
« Last Edit: February 27, 2025, 10:34:07 AM by acino »

acino

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #307 on: February 28, 2025, 08:33:39 AM »
Maybe try reading it one more time, and the conversation that it is part of.

Because nobody is expecting or asking for any protection or guarantee.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2025, 08:43:18 AM by acino »

Sander2177

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #308 on: February 28, 2025, 09:47:44 AM »
Maybe try reading it one more time, and the conversation that it is part of.

Because nobody is expecting or asking for any protection or guarantee.

Hows this:

Your message raises a valid point about the lack of consumer protection when purchasing through certain channels. I wouldn't necessarily call it nihilistic either—it's simply acknowledging the reality of an unregulated market. Consumer protection laws exist for a reason: to provide buyers with recourse in case of misleading claims or defective products. Without such safeguards, verifying a seller's claims—such as the exact carbon layup of a frame—becomes nearly impossible.

I agree that there are various motivations for sellers to be truthful or evasive, and that this isn’t always tied to malice or product quality. However, the absence of accountability means buyers have to rely on empirical evidence, personal experience, or trusted reviews to mitigate risk. Even well-established manufacturers occasionally produce flawed products, which reinforces the need for due diligence.

Your perspective, shaped by a reliance on experimental evidence, makes complete sense. In the end, purchasing from these sources is inherently a gamble—one that can be informed but never entirely risk-free. The best approach is to gather as much reliable information as possible and weigh the potential risks against the benefits.

mozart

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #309 on: March 01, 2025, 05:55:45 AM »
I asked RK Ultra Extreme Carbon Fiber Store about shipping to the EU/Germany, which isn't possible atm. They said that they're working on implementing DPD shipping "this year" and to wait patiently for a while.
i ask the same. and they want to help them to understand how dpd works. i sent them all info and told me that they send very soon
« Last Edit: March 01, 2025, 07:22:29 AM by mozart »

Takiyaki

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #310 on: March 01, 2025, 08:06:33 AM »


Edit: I don't know, perhaps it's just my job, where experimental evidence is the only thing that matters, manifesting...

I had and lost a whole long response. My point was I spent most of my career in engineering and data analysis and have found that data alone isn't enough; you have to understand the data's completeness and relevance to the problem you are trying to solve. In terms of determining the quality/safety of a bike frame and its related company, to me the # of folks riding and reviewing them is prob the best data. Yes obviously there are going to be issues with every brand, but a more established + high volume brand usually handles them better and has a lower problem probability overall.

So I may be overly conservative, but I wouldnt bother with any fly by night pop up store/brand selling these replicas. Theres just not enough user/brand history to draw any meaningful conclusions on the quality or safety of the frame. And odds are you will be completely SOL if there are any issues. A lot of needless risk IMO. I just dont understand the replica thing. I mean I can understand an SLx clone from a big brand. But this shit here? Gambling with your life to make people think you bought a Factor just seems crazy to me.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2025, 08:51:51 AM by Takiyaki »

user757

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #311 on: March 01, 2025, 08:31:22 AM »
Very nice, keep us posted. Interested especially in that D shaped steerer that scares me.
The frame looks so much like my open mould Long Teng.
Yet another friend this weekend who thought Tractor was Factor and assumed I was riding a superbike :D wonderful trolling. I then told him how much it cost me and now he wants one.

Can I ask how you fitted this bike, approximate cost?

Serge_K

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #312 on: March 01, 2025, 12:04:14 PM »
Can I ask how you fitted this bike, approximate cost?

Hahaha, wonderful timing, this very friend literally wired me 2750 EUR last night to order him a bike. It includes super high end wheels (carbon spokes, T1000...). Basically the budgets have been 2500-2700 all in. Ltwoo er9, conti gp5000, carbon crankset, ultralight cassette, 36cm one piece cockpit, with pedals, bottle cages, Garmin mount, saddle bag, spare tpu tubes and so on. If you go ltwoo mechanical and humbler wheels, you can go sub 2000 easily.
Fast on the flat. And nowhere else.

sid

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #313 on: March 06, 2025, 02:54:03 PM »
Hello - I have a ostro vam and it looks like the handlebars is developing a crack - any suggestions on where I can get a decent replacement - v1

BeR

Re: Replica Factor Ostro VAM
« Reply #314 on: March 06, 2025, 06:19:42 PM »
Hello - I have a ostro vam and it looks like the handlebars is developing a crack - any suggestions on where I can get a decent replacement - v1

Which seller was it ? Which version (cheap / normal / ultralight) ? How many kilometers ? No warranty ?

You can ask to F-C may be.