Author Topic: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)  (Read 7395 times)

Lotnik

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #75 on: January 27, 2025, 07:38:49 AM »
This would be our newest frameset and handlebar. First size would be available in April.

looking good. I'm interested in geo chart. 

Gloopann

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #76 on: January 27, 2025, 02:59:15 PM »
High stack, short reach, more aggressive geometry than Factor but less than Pina X

I might be reading this wrong but I assume you meant less aggressive geometry than Factor Ostro but more aggressive than Pinarello X, unless I am unaware of some super relaxed Factor.

Here is my only question now: which position do you like the battery located ? Seat post or low side of bottom bracket ?

If you stick to T47 or some other threaded standard (which I hope you do, I hate pressfit) my vote is around the bottom bracket 10/10 times, especially if you manage to package it similarly to the current gen supersix evo.

Also, would it be possible to print a grid on the handlebars, where the levers are fixed? I often see horizontal lines printed which are great for setting the height, but people often angle their hoods in and having the grid would allow us to set both the height and the angle symmetrically.

rasch

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #77 on: January 27, 2025, 03:34:17 PM »
This would be our newest frameset and handlebar. First size would be available in April.

Looks great! Looking forward to have prices and geometry chart. I have another client building a new endurance mid march so if geometry and pricing is ok, might be a solid choice for him.


Daviddavieboy

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #78 on: January 28, 2025, 03:10:17 AM »
Peak Torque has done a video few years ago on compliance of carbon tubes, he also did a simulation of load bearing of few most popular seatpost shapes:
https://youtu.be/C8eg4O3OrvM?si=oRzFzLxhokAimy3J&t=831

 Thanks for the video. Sums up what I knew already about tubing in the first place. All other things being equal the round tube has the most deflection. I  know steel tubing very well but carbon is still a bit of a mystery.

casper.f

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #79 on: January 28, 2025, 05:31:40 AM »
I might be reading this wrong but I assume you meant less aggressive geometry than Factor Ostro but more aggressive than Pinarello X, unless I am unaware of some super relaxed Factor.
Maybe the ostro gravel?

Gloopann

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #80 on: January 28, 2025, 12:35:57 PM »
Maybe the ostro gravel?

Don’t think so, the Ostro Gravel has even more reach than the regular Ostro, the stack is a bit taller but I wouldn’t exactly call it a relaxed geometry.