Author Topic: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)  (Read 10883 times)

Lotnik

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #75 on: January 27, 2025, 07:38:49 AM »
This would be our newest frameset and handlebar. First size would be available in April.

looking good. I'm interested in geo chart. 

Gloopann

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #76 on: January 27, 2025, 02:59:15 PM »
High stack, short reach, more aggressive geometry than Factor but less than Pina X

I might be reading this wrong but I assume you meant less aggressive geometry than Factor Ostro but more aggressive than Pinarello X, unless I am unaware of some super relaxed Factor.

Here is my only question now: which position do you like the battery located ? Seat post or low side of bottom bracket ?

If you stick to T47 or some other threaded standard (which I hope you do, I hate pressfit) my vote is around the bottom bracket 10/10 times, especially if you manage to package it similarly to the current gen supersix evo.

Also, would it be possible to print a grid on the handlebars, where the levers are fixed? I often see horizontal lines printed which are great for setting the height, but people often angle their hoods in and having the grid would allow us to set both the height and the angle symmetrically.

rasch

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #77 on: January 27, 2025, 03:34:17 PM »
This would be our newest frameset and handlebar. First size would be available in April.

Looks great! Looking forward to have prices and geometry chart. I have another client building a new endurance mid march so if geometry and pricing is ok, might be a solid choice for him.


Daviddavieboy

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #78 on: January 28, 2025, 03:10:17 AM »
Peak Torque has done a video few years ago on compliance of carbon tubes, he also did a simulation of load bearing of few most popular seatpost shapes:
https://youtu.be/C8eg4O3OrvM?si=oRzFzLxhokAimy3J&t=831

 Thanks for the video. Sums up what I knew already about tubing in the first place. All other things being equal the round tube has the most deflection. I  know steel tubing very well but carbon is still a bit of a mystery.

casper.f

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #79 on: January 28, 2025, 05:31:40 AM »
I might be reading this wrong but I assume you meant less aggressive geometry than Factor Ostro but more aggressive than Pinarello X, unless I am unaware of some super relaxed Factor.
Maybe the ostro gravel?

Gloopann

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #80 on: January 28, 2025, 12:35:57 PM »
Maybe the ostro gravel?

Don’t think so, the Ostro Gravel has even more reach than the regular Ostro, the stack is a bit taller but I wouldn’t exactly call it a relaxed geometry.

PeterXu

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #81 on: February 08, 2025, 07:19:09 AM »
Looks great! Looking forward to have prices and geometry chart. I have another client building a new endurance mid march so if geometry and pricing is ok, might be a solid choice for him.


looking good. I'm interested in geo chart.
Geometry attached. Size 56cm would be the first mold available in April. Since we make this frameset with high standard as couple of big brands, you could tell the details when it is available, one piece mold, mixed of T1100, 40T, 30T Toray carbon fiber. latex molding etc. The price on this frameset with handlebar won't be that cheap as our previous frameset.  But would be cheaper than some other Chinese brands.
Carbon rims, wheels, frames and components manufacturer
peter@xmcarbonspeed.com  petercycles@foxmail.com
WhatsApp: +86 18250808148
www.xmcarbonspeed.com

Uberflo

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #82 on: February 08, 2025, 07:43:33 AM »
You go for T47i? Any standard for the headset/handlebar cable routing (e. g. FSA ACR or Deda DCR)?

rasch

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #83 on: February 08, 2025, 07:54:31 AM »
Geometry attached. Size 56cm would be the first mold available in April. Since we make this frameset with high standard as couple of big brands, you could tell the details when it is available, one piece mold, mixed of T1100, 40T, 30T Toray carbon fiber. latex molding etc. The price on this frameset with handlebar won't be that cheap as our previous frameset.  But would be cheaper than some other Chinese brands.

Seatpost height looks slightly higher than usual. In any case it seems to fit the requirements most people mentioned.
Now looking to hear the pricing as it might the the biggest drawback especially considering the tariffs which are coming soon everywhere

PeterXu

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #84 on: February 08, 2025, 07:56:47 AM »
You go for T47i? Any standard for the headset/handlebar cable routing (e. g. FSA ACR or Deda DCR)?
700*35C max tire clearance, UDH, T47 85.5mm bottom bracket, both top and down 52mm headtube
two types seat clamps for either 7*7 or 7*9 saddle rails
Size 54cm weight would be around 895+/-30g after painted and with front and rear derailleur hanger mounted.
Handlebar cable routing FSA ACR style.
wireless and traditional mechanical compatible.
Carbon rims, wheels, frames and components manufacturer
peter@xmcarbonspeed.com  petercycles@foxmail.com
WhatsApp: +86 18250808148
www.xmcarbonspeed.com

jordanc1010

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #85 on: February 08, 2025, 10:56:13 AM »
This sounds perfect for what I want. I am going to buy this depending on price.

neobiker

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #86 on: February 09, 2025, 02:12:50 AM »
I will wait for the pricing, but I guess the 54 is the one I am waiting for xD

jordanc1010

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #87 on: February 09, 2025, 04:46:37 AM »
Yea im going to be waiting for a 58. Any idea when that will be coming peter?

janp

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #88 on: February 09, 2025, 11:21:08 AM »
Hi Peter,

can you please add the min. / max. height of the rails to mount the saddle (measured from the center of the BB) to the geometry chart. I made a bad experiences and selected a frame that was not suitable for my saddle height.

mark335

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #89 on: February 09, 2025, 02:10:19 PM »
Hi guys, I did not want to create similar post with the same requirement, but do you know if on chinese market exisit similar frame to Basso Astra or Diamante?
I am also looking for high stack/low reach, good looking frame, especially horizontal top tube.

Astra 51        S/R 563,4/374,5
Diamante 51  S/R 546.2/378,6

The only frame which comes to my mind is CS-R06 from Peter, but I hope you will know more  ;)