FM1001 / FM1156 - 135mm frame

[casual_build]

Generally speaking, when Ican sells a Carbonda frame, it’s coming from the same Flybike factory and should be identical.

Do you have information to support that? I think they are different.

IIRC FM1001 stands for "flybike mold 1001". Flybike makes molds and frames. AFIAK, Carbonda and ICAN could be using different carbon or a different carbon layup in the frame.

ICAN lists the P13 medium at 2.65kg and Carbonda lists the medium 1001 at 2.3kg.

Lighter is better IMO, usually means smarter layup or better materials.

[Neb]

It has gone a bit quiet in here... How is everyone getting on with their FM1001 frames?

I've done about 2000km on mine, not high on mileage but descended about 45000m of very rough, rocky, natural trails. Still one of the best bikes I've ever had.

[Tijoe]

I primarily rode my hardtails and gravel bike this past summer.  I rode my FS bike perhaps 8 times.  I still need to fine tune the shocks.  A buddy has a shock wiz that he helps us tune our suspensions.  I didn't get around to finishing the tune, so I can't state how much I like this bike overall because the shocks aren't optimized, plus, I lost 15 pounds over the summer, and this affects the harshness and travel of the shocks, just enough to bug me.

[bossman302]

I believe I just hit the 3 year mark this month. I've only put about 1,350 miles in that time. The only issues I've had have been the bearings. Had to replace the lower shock bearings 2 times so far. Also replaced all the main pivot bearings. Four were bad. Unfortunately, I haven't used the bike all that much this year as I went to the dark side and purchased an e-bike. Been riding the e-bike since all my riding buddies have e-bikes as well. Overall, it's been a good bike. The only change I want to make is the travel on the fork. Hoping bumping it up to 150 might help some of the harshness when riding through the chunk.

[filipes]

IMHO 150 fork is a must-have for this bike to be proper tail bike. Stabiliy at speed & confidence in steep is step up. Also stack is quite low, so 150 and high riser bar help here. Does anybody ride FM1001 with 160 fork? The only reason why not to it is higher BB and reach robbed by another 5mm.... HA 64,5 is absolutely fine, SA slackedned to 77 still acceptable...

[filipes]

Did anybody investigated if there is any possibilty to slacken HA? 64 would be very nice. The only option I find out is IS56/IS56 from Acros but it requires special arrangement in the frame (probably holes), so too much complicaiton.

[zilcho]

IMHO 150 fork is a must-have for this bike to be proper tail bike. Stabiliy at speed & confidence in steep is step up. Also stack is quite low, so 150 and high riser bar help here. Does anybody ride FM1001 with 160 fork? The only reason why not to it is higher BB and reach robbed by another 5mm.... HA 64,5 is absolutely fine, SA slackedned to 77 still acceptable...

Why not go for the 1002 at that point? It already has a 64.5 HA with the suggested 150 fork, and 160/135 on the 1001 is getting to be quite uneven for the use case. I run a 150 on my 1001 and agree with your positive points, but I think it negatively impacts the bikes ability in steep, technical climbing.

[Neb]

Did anybody investigated if there is any possibilty to slacken HA? 64 would be very nice. The only option I find out is IS56/IS56 from Acros but it requires special arrangement in the frame (probably holes), so too much complicaiton.

I have an offset bushing in the rear shock which slackens it the HA and the SA by 0.5°, if you add a 150mm fork it will slacken it further.