What matters most and we still don't know is what the spacer situation is, and what the third party / stem cockpit situation is.
Also from my perspective, they had mentioned a 61 size, but still no geo forthcoming.
This makes or break the success of this frame.
For the pros and flexible riders, this geometry looks like the perfect stack to reach ratio. But there should always be room for the average rider to
easily play around with stack, stem length, bar width etc.
The
"aero profile" issues or weight is subjective especially for the average rider and can be compensated through other means (aero posture, aero bottles, lighter components etc).
It is always about the rider and if the rider can be made to fit nicely to this frame then it really looks like an affordable, stylish dedicated aero bike.