Author Topic: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts  (Read 504516 times)

QuentinLL

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1230 on: December 10, 2020, 02:17:18 AM »
Another option would be the rockshox Nude 165x40mm : https://www.starbike.com/fr/rockshox-deluxe-nude-rlc3-rear-shock-mreb-mcomp-430lb-lockout-trunnion-standard/
3 pos, it should work as a 2 pos if the total cable pull is around 10mm. But I can't find the information.

carbonazza

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1231 on: December 10, 2020, 11:09:25 AM »
Anyone tried already to remove the bushing of a SidLuxe to put a bearing instead ?
It looks to be very hard to get out. More force ?

Pharaohollie

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1232 on: December 10, 2020, 12:27:46 PM »
Anyone tried already to remove the bushing of a SidLuxe to put a bearing instead ?
It looks to be very hard to get out. More force ?

Not a SidLuxe, but the Deluxe RLR I bought had an incredibly tight bushing, which I removed to fit a RWC needle bearing kit.

Denis

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1233 on: December 10, 2020, 12:48:49 PM »
Anyone tried already to remove the bushing of a SidLuxe to put a bearing instead ?
It looks to be very hard to get out. More force ?
https://www.bike-components.de/de/RockShox/Rear-Shock-Bushing-Tool-Montagewerkzeug-fuer-Gleitbuchsen-p30649/
Nice tool for this work.

carbonazza

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1234 on: December 10, 2020, 04:12:41 PM »
https://www.bike-components.de/de/RockShox/Rear-Shock-Bushing-Tool-Montagewerkzeug-fuer-Gleitbuchsen-p30649/
Nice tool for this work.
Thanks Pharaollie & Denis, yes I saw the tool.
As well as a guy who shows on YouTube how to get it it out with a vice, and a 10mm socket and a bigger one.
Or with the same sockets and a bearing press.
So I guess, yes more force is needed.

adroitrider

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1235 on: December 10, 2020, 08:49:41 PM »
Thanks Pharaollie & Denis, yes I saw the tool.
As well as a guy who shows on YouTube how to get it it out with a vice, and a 10mm socket and a bigger one.
Or with the same sockets and a bearing press.
So I guess, yes more force is needed.

I tried the vice and ended up ordering the tool. To get the RWC bearing installed I used the vice method.

Zipper85

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1236 on: December 11, 2020, 01:29:07 AM »
I would also be interested in this frame, do you have a photo where the shock is to see how you have arranged the remote cable? Thanks

jimmyD

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1237 on: December 11, 2020, 03:48:05 AM »
Is the Shock hardware needed 22.2x8mm of 22.2x6mm? have tried searching this thread but didnt see it.

Cheers guys

QuentinLL

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1238 on: December 11, 2020, 04:12:19 AM »
Is the Shock hardware needed 22.2x8mm of 22.2x6mm? have tried searching this thread but didnt see it.

Cheers guys

Search for "22.2" and you'll find it. Post #956 ===> 22.2x8.


For FOX : https://www.bike-components.de/de/Fox-Racing-Shox/Aluminium-Einbaubuchsenset-8-mm-5-teilig-p32318/

For RS: https://www.bike-components.de/de/RockShox/Einbaubuchsen-fuer-Federbeine-8-mm-fuer-Monarch-Kage-Vivid-Ario-ab-2010-p24675/

You need 22.2 mm width. Also you can use fox bushing in rockshox, just need to remove standart DU bushing in eyelet, in my opininon fox bushing works better with this style suspension.

Also there is enduro needle bearings, fits all shocks. https://www.bike24.com/p2223514.html?q=enduro%20needle
I've bought it as a spare bushing for fox, but ride all season with standart fox, works great.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2020, 06:28:00 AM by QuentinLL »

wfl3

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1239 on: December 11, 2020, 05:58:19 AM »
Is the Shock hardware needed 22.2x8mm of 22.2x6mm? have tried searching this thread but didnt see it.

Cheers guys

22.2x8mm

jimmyD

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1240 on: December 11, 2020, 04:16:18 PM »

jimmyD

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1241 on: December 12, 2020, 02:19:39 AM »
I’ve found a remote shock solution if any one is interested. It might be too expensive for some people but it’s an option non the less and it took a lot of searching to find it so thought I’d share it here.

I’ve just ordered a modified Fox Factory Float DPS 165x40 Trunnion mount shock from Aiden at https://cyclinic.com.au/ in Australia. He will mod a non remote 165x40 shock to have a remote that works in unison with a Sid ultimate shock (normally the fox shock would open/lock with opposite remote lever movements). So this will let me operate front and rear with the Rockshox Twostloc remote.

Zipper85

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1242 on: December 12, 2020, 05:12:41 AM »
sorry but i'm a bit ignorant about this frame. Is it not possible to mount a normal 2-position remote control shock absorber on the handlebar? Thanks

RobertRinAustin

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1243 on: December 12, 2020, 07:47:41 AM »
sorry but i'm a bit ignorant about this frame. Is it not possible to mount a normal 2-position remote control shock absorber on the handlebar? Thanks
Yes, this is not the problem. The problem is finding a remote shock in the correct size. Rockshox only offers the right size to OEMs and the Fox shocks normally operate opposite of the way RS shocks twist so you couldn't use the same controller for both front and rear shocks if you have a Sid and a Fox. JimmyD's solution allows you mix the Sid and Fox with a single remote.

albar

Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« Reply #1244 on: December 13, 2020, 01:16:46 PM »
I think the easiest way is to make an axle for a standard shock 165x38 shock to pair it with Fox fork. For an experienced turner, this is a task of a few minutes. In any case, I will make such an axle when my frame arrives. I'll write about the results.
By the way. I replaced stock Fox remote with DT Swiss. It is a product of the different leve of quality.